Journal cover Journal topic
Climate of the Past An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.382 IF 3.382
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.684 IF 5-year
  • SNIP value: 1.210 SNIP 1.210
  • IPP value: 3.845 IPP 3.845
  • SJR value: 2.401 SJR 2.401
  • h5-index value: 33 h5-index 33
Clim. Past, 6, 771-785, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
01 Dec 2010
Perturbing phytoplankton: response and isotopic fractionation with changing carbonate chemistry in two coccolithophore species
R. E. M. Rickaby1,**, J. Henderiks2,*, and J. N. Young1
1Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PR, UK
2Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
*now at: Department of Earth Sciences, Paleobiology Program, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
**Invited contribution by R. E. M. Rickaby, recipient of the EGU Arne Richter Award for Outstanding Young Scientists 2008.

Abstract. All species of coccolithophore appear to respond to perturbations of carbonate chemistry in a different way. Here, we show that the degree of malformation, growth rate and stable isotopic composition of organic matter and carbonate produced by two contrasting species of coccolithophore (Gephyrocapsa oceanica and Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. braarudii) are indicative of differences between their photosynthetic and calcification response to changing DIC levels (ranging from ~1100 to ~7800 μmol kg−1) at constant pH (8.13 ± 0.02). Gephyrocapsa oceanica thrived under all conditions of DIC, showing evidence of increased growth rates at higher DIC, but C. braarudii was detrimentally affected at high DIC showing signs of malformation, and decreased growth rates. The carbon isotopic fractionation into organic matter and the coccoliths suggests that C. braarudii utilises a common internal pool of carbon for calcification and photosynthesis but G. oceanica relies on independent supplies for each process. All coccolithophores appear to utilize bicarbonate as their ultimate source of carbon for calcification resulting in the release of a proton. But, we suggest that this proton can be harnessed to enhance the supply of CO2(aq) for photosynthesis either from a large internal HCO3- pool which acts as a pH buffer (C. braarudii), or pumped externally to aid the diffusive supply of CO2 across the membrane from the abundant HCO3- (G. oceanica), likely mediated by an internal and external carbonic anhydrase respectively. Our simplified hypothetical spectrum of physiologies may provide a context to understand different species response to changing pH and DIC, the species-specific εp and calcite "vital effects", as well as accounting for geological trends in coccolithophore cell size.

Citation: Rickaby, R. E. M., Henderiks, J., and Young, J. N.: Perturbing phytoplankton: response and isotopic fractionation with changing carbonate chemistry in two coccolithophore species, Clim. Past, 6, 771-785, doi:10.5194/cp-6-771-2010, 2010.
Search CP
Final Revised Paper
Discussion Paper