Journal cover Journal topic
Climate of the Past An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.638 IF 3.638
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.722 IF 5-year
  • SNIP value: 0.979 SNIP 0.979
  • IPP value: 3.298 IPP 3.298
  • SJR value: 2.047 SJR 2.047
  • h5-index value: 35 h5-index 35
Clim. Past, 8, 89-115, 2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
10 Jan 2012
Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data
V. K. C. Venema1, O. Mestre2, E. Aguilar3, I. Auer4, J. A. Guijarro5, P. Domonkos3, G. Vertacnik6, T. Szentimrey7, P. Stepanek8,9, P. Zahradnicek8,9, J. Viarre3, G. Müller-Westermeier10, M. Lakatos7, C. N. Williams11, M. J. Menne11, R. Lindau1, D. Rasol12, E. Rustemeier1, K. Kolokythas13, T. Marinova14, L. Andresen15, F. Acquaotta16, S. Fratianni16, S. Cheval17,18, M. Klancar6, M. Brunetti19, C. Gruber4, M. Prohom Duran20,21, T. Likso12, P. Esteban20,22, and T. Brandsma23 1Meteorological institute of the University of Bonn, Germany
2Meteo France, Ecole Nationale de la Meteorologie, Toulouse, France
3Center on Climate Change (C3), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
4Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien, Austria
5Agencia Estatal de Meteorologia, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
6Slovenian Environment Agency, Ljubljana, Slovenia
7Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary
8Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
9Czechglobe-Global Change Research Centre AS CR, v.v.i., Brno, Czech Republic
10Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
11NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, USA
12Meteorological and hydrological service, Zagreb, Croatia
13Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, University of Patras, Greece
14National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology – BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria
15Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
16Department of Earth Science, University of Turin, Italy
17National Meteorological Administration, Bucharest, Romania
18National Institute for R&D in Environmental Protection, Bucharest, Romania
19Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC-CNR), Bologna, Italy
20Grup de Climatologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
21Meteorological Service of Catalonia, Area of Climatology, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
22Centre d'Estudis de la Neu i de la Muntanya d'Andorra (CENMA-IEA), Andorra
23Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands
Abstract. The COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action ES0601: advances in homogenization methods of climate series: an integrated approach (HOME) has executed a blind intercomparison and validation study for monthly homogenization algorithms. Time series of monthly temperature and precipitation were evaluated because of their importance for climate studies and because they represent two important types of statistics (additive and multiplicative). The algorithms were validated against a realistic benchmark dataset. The benchmark contains real inhomogeneous data as well as simulated data with inserted inhomogeneities. Random independent break-type inhomogeneities with normally distributed breakpoint sizes were added to the simulated datasets. To approximate real world conditions, breaks were introduced that occur simultaneously in multiple station series within a simulated network of station data. The simulated time series also contained outliers, missing data periods and local station trends. Further, a stochastic nonlinear global (network-wide) trend was added.

Participants provided 25 separate homogenized contributions as part of the blind study. After the deadline at which details of the imposed inhomogeneities were revealed, 22 additional solutions were submitted. These homogenized datasets were assessed by a number of performance metrics including (i) the centered root mean square error relative to the true homogeneous value at various averaging scales, (ii) the error in linear trend estimates and (iii) traditional contingency skill scores. The metrics were computed both using the individual station series as well as the network average regional series. The performance of the contributions depends significantly on the error metric considered. Contingency scores by themselves are not very informative. Although relative homogenization algorithms typically improve the homogeneity of temperature data, only the best ones improve precipitation data. Training the users on homogenization software was found to be very important. Moreover, state-of-the-art relative homogenization algorithms developed to work with an inhomogeneous reference are shown to perform best. The study showed that automatic algorithms can perform as well as manual ones.

Citation: Venema, V. K. C., Mestre, O., Aguilar, E., Auer, I., Guijarro, J. A., Domonkos, P., Vertacnik, G., Szentimrey, T., Stepanek, P., Zahradnicek, P., Viarre, J., Müller-Westermeier, G., Lakatos, M., Williams, C. N., Menne, M. J., Lindau, R., Rasol, D., Rustemeier, E., Kolokythas, K., Marinova, T., Andresen, L., Acquaotta, F., Fratianni, S., Cheval, S., Klancar, M., Brunetti, M., Gruber, C., Prohom Duran, M., Likso, T., Esteban, P., and Brandsma, T.: Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data, Clim. Past, 8, 89-115, doi:10.5194/cp-8-89-2012, 2012.
Publications Copernicus