Journal cover Journal topic
Climate of the Past An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.174 IF 3.174
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.48 CiteScore
    3.48
  • SNIP value: 1.078 SNIP 1.078
  • SJR value: 1.981 SJR 1.981
  • IPP value: 3.38 IPP 3.38
  • h5-index value: 42 h5-index 42
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 58 Scimago H
    index 58
Volume 6, issue 4 | Copyright
Clim. Past, 6, 411-414, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-411-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  02 Jul 2010

02 Jul 2010

Comment on "Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity" by J. D. Annan and J. C. Hargreaves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006

S. V. Henriksson1, E. Arjas2, M. Laine1, J. Tamminen1, and A. Laaksonen1,3 S. V. Henriksson et al.
  • 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00101, Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Kuopio, 70211, Kuopio, Finland

Abstract. In their article from 2006, Annan and Hargreaves present a probabilistic estimate of climate sensitivity obtained by using Bayes' theorem to combine information from different sources. In this comment article we critisize two aspects of their reasoning, namely using probability density functions and likelihood functions interchangeably and the assumed independence of evidence from the different sources. The derivation of their result rests on key assumptions, some stated explicitly and some left implicit, which could be unrealistic. Thus their study does not convincingly reduce the large uncertainty of climate sensitivity remaining in previous observationally-based studies.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share